Abstract
Commonalities between homo & diphyla
GizaPower website from an engineer informs us of the amazing possibilities of having a chamber of granite with quartz—–pizeoelectric generation. In the form of F flat. Sound directed to the kings chamber. Where the granite sarcophagus which wasn’t used as a tomb lies. But the problem here is what was all that energy applied to? Where is the infrastructure that used the energy? Carving granite is all well and good but what for? To make a pyramid complex on the equator to take advantage of the greatest resonance, OK. But then what? Hydrogen gas to fuel what?
Lets say the Pyramid complexes were able to induce a calming resonance, say about 3 to 5 Hz. Calming sort of like the Russian Woodpecker. Or maybe they were just barometers. J Parr says a lot about the energy but again how would it be used. Imagine a uneducated person viewing a pressure change in a barometer, wouldn’t that be impressive. It must mean something important. It would to the person who made it but not to the viewer or even us.
Interestingly, without the theory of relativity gold would not be gold; it would be a silvery gold which just exactly matches what the Atlanteans coated their city with, Orichlac. Viewed as a mixture of gold and silver because it was silvery gold. Maybe it was gold pre relativism. Strange thought. But then, what if whatever eliminated the land mass of the Cayman Trench was powerful enough to change our world?
We now have a huge plasma bubble emerging from our galactic center. Will our poles reverse when we are encompassed? Would the pyramids have indicated to their builders that such an event was underway?
Science has noted how objects seem to maintain themselves in stasis over time when placed in the pyramid chamber. This would lead to the idea that the pyramids themselves are immensely older, maybe a couple of billion years, than we imagine. Hence the conjectures of multi-verses and string theory. Scientists have been reported to conclude, in spite of our anthropomorphic view of ourselves as the apex civilization, that it does not seem likely that life would have waited to occur so late in the day on our very hospitable Earth. So the idea that life on Earth began billions of years ago, culminating in the smarter selves who are not now around to verify this fact.
When asking questions as to why the 23.5% tilt of Earth’s axis, we do not know why or when. We know the ice ages started about 200,000 years ago when prior to this Earth was even tempered. Why the ice ages started we do not know. After the solar system heating event of 600,000 years ago, when we identify multicellular life as beginning, the Earth underwent land mass division which we vend as plate tectonics. Amazingly, this occurred in a yo-yo effect. Speculation as to Mars terraforming at the heating event 1/2 billion years ago exists.
We have identified Oklo and assign a natural pattern to the on/off activity that produced radioactive materials over millennium. The fact that the current Earth dominant species seems not to have achieved what was accomplished at Oklo fails to elicit a chorus of exclamations. The founders of the massive stone civilizations in the southern Andes and the Mexican plateau are lost to history; the people who moved in and claimed home base are not. Some of the information they handed down we suspect may have been not their own.
When the pyramid complex at the Cayman Trench site was destroyed —in a really big way—-the survivors ran to the back up units—–Giza was the second choice—-to be the first to claim home base (again). As scientists have concluded based on pyramids out-of-time, life is far older and advanced faster and is now being replaced with a ‘different’ version as E O Wilson demonstrated with his island life-extinction event. Life returns, even to the same level, just different species.
The pyramids may be seen as a technology-out-of-time. It existed more than a billion years ago and was designed to last for that long. Why Stephen Hawkings deigns to warn us about ‘contact.’ Scientists tell us all life forms end in extinction as 99.9% of all species ever to exist are now gone. Science has arrived at Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s assertion: When you have eliminated the impossible, what ever remains, however improbable, is the answer.
The Pyramids have no relevance in the history of our world. They exist as a technology-out-of-time. And, in time, we shall meet the same fate that befell the makers. Extinction.
When crisis befalls a civilization it is almost impossible to leave and start new. You tend to recreate the old because of an impossible to relieve psychological pressure. My teacher asked me why did the Europeans recreate their old towns to the extent of rebuilding them the same? Well, this is why. You are emotionally and psychologically unable to separate from the past even when the new conditions fail to support your recreation of the past. You just keep beating your head against a stone wall.
If this form —pyramid envy— was what kept your economy going, you sure wouldn’t give it up, not if you were able to eke along. Consider: When the users of the pyramid complex at the Cayman Trench site (when it was above ground) lost it to a volcanic explosion, they relied on their fall back position opposite the world in China. The Sanxingdui culture found by archaeologists in an isolated mountainous part of southern China baffled all who found it. Masks of gold that seemed more South American than Chinese, the fact that the masks were determined to be supported on poles, the inexplicable tree of life of beaten gold.
The Yellow River culture of the ethnic Han was contemporaneous, not related. So here we have the survivors of the catastrophe the befell the Cayman Trench civilization crossing the world to their back up site only to be unable to establish themselves —-obviously the very few of them—– in the face of a new well-established culture. Frightening off the natives with scary masks on poles didn’t seem to work. In fact, the reigning Chinese warlord sent thousands of ‘settlers’ to farm this area. Scratch Site B.
Giza was next, and then, after the immediate founding of the Old Kingdom, nothing. Nada, Zilch, All gone. Did they ever get the pyramid power collector going? Was all the evidence from the ancient use? What was made there anyway? Consider: if it was not for making something that would require the application of high tech like fueling spaceships with hydrogen gas, it was for something far lower tech but still required much more energy than what was available Earth-side. It was what philosophers centuries later would call the search for the philosopher’s stone. How to make gold. Gold, it seems is a noble metal, it stands alone. And although our high tech ability allows us to produce gold, we can’t afford to. It seems to take as much energy to produce it as it is worth. Ditto splitting the atom for fuel.
So, what are we doing up in Alaska? Building a Tesla coil on a huge embedded grid. Gold, it seems, will be dragged out of the air if we are lucky/unlucky enough to draw down a current capable of the tremendous power required. If the ionosphere is a collector of cosmic ions, then see the HAARP site as a potential savior—a draw-down site to spare some nuclear facility or combined electrical grid. But then if all HAARP is for is to attract a partial charge but of sufficient magnitude to create gold, then it is just another military fiasco. Gold for creating a light-bending sheath for some military boondoggle. Maybe the intention is to draw a bit at a time from the ionosphere, keeping it below the tipping point for discharge ala Cayman Trench. We wish.
The smarter, older us may have built the pyramid complexes, but it seems they are gone. And if our Earth has the propensity to heat internally and simultaneously be blasted by bolts collected by our own ionosphere, then that was a smart move. But we just don’t know, at least not yet.
What we do know is that the blast that obliterated the civilization of the Cayman Trench left the remaining peoples desperate. The ionization spread death and mutation far and wide. The residue from the volcanic blast itself created carbon disufide, a notoriously deadly mutagen. Ash would cool the world. And it would spawn the creation of the first-known application of eugenics. Exposure of newborns would become the forced method the civilization adopted to save themselves. Chosen by default, mourned and agonized over.
The science in all this asks the question: how did chirality come to be? Why are we dependent upon only Left Handed Amino Acids and not right? And Right Handed sugars and not left? Note in the article below is reference to the “circularly polarized ultraviolet light” which produces a slight excess of chirality. Think about that: we are exclusive users of Left Handed Amino Acids in much the same way as the species Diphyla are requisite blood drinkers. And the military is going to use circularly polarized ultraviolet light to create their cloak of invisibility. Extinction event ahead.
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/87/8712sci1.html
Even if meteors brought an initial imbalance of chirality to Earth, that still doesn’t explain how the meteors had an imbalance in the first place. Breslow’s 2008 study invokes a theory first put forward by a team led by the late William A. Bonner, a Stanford University chemist. Bonner and his coworkers proposed that amino acids could have encountered circularly polarized ultraviolet light, a type of radiation that produces a slight enantiomeric excess (Nature 1983, 306, 118).
WORK FROM a team at Argonne National Laboratory suggests that electrons generated in space are another feasible source of that first chiral imbalance (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 178301). There, Richard A. Rosenberg and coworkers exposed a magnetic material placed under high vacuum to ionizing radiation from an X-ray light source, which generates low-energy electrons with spins aligned in one direction. They demonstrated that these low-energy electrons can break the carbon-oxygen bond in 2-butanol, a simple chiral molecule that they adsorbed on their magnetic material, a nickel-iron alloy. The bond-cleaving rate is significantly faster for one enantiomer than the other. Which enantiomer ends up winning depends on the direction of the low-energy electrons’ spin, which is determined by the magnetic material’s magnetic dipole moment.
Perhaps the biggest challenge for origin-of-homochirality studies in the future will be to move away from thinking about the field in isolation, Imperial College’s Blackmond says. Chirality alone doesn’t tell the story of how life began—there are also unanswered questions about molecular complexity and self-replicating systems, for example. “It’s neat to show that you can make pure left-handed or right-handed crystals,” she says. “It’s a harder problem to think about where we go from there.”
Study science as everything we know is underlain by chemistry which is another word for electricity.
katesisco 