What’s Out There

HERE'S WHAT I THINK HAPPENEDWhat’s out there? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf The nearest known white dwarf is Sirius B, at 8.6 light years, the smaller component of the Sirius binary star. There are currently thought to be eight white dwarfs among the hundred star systems nearest the Sun. maximum mass for a non-rotating white dwarf, the Chandrasekhar limit—approximately 1.46 M - This was done for Sirius B by 1910,[31] yielding a mass estimate of 0.94 M White dwarfs have low luminosity and therefore occupy a strip at the bottom of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, a graph of stellar luminosity versus color (or temperature). They should not be confused with low-luminosity objects at the low-mass end of the main sequence, such as the hydrogen-fusing red dwarfs, whose cores are supported in part by thermal pressure,[50] or the even lower-temperature brown dwarfs.[ Although white dwarf material is initially plasma—a fluid composed of nuclei and electrons—it was theoretically predicted in the 1960s that at a late stage of cooling, it should crystallize, starting at its center.[69] The crystal structure is thought to be a body-centered cubic lattice.[5][70] In 1995 it was suggested that asteroseismological observations of pulsating white dwarfs yielded a potential test of the crystallization theory,[71] and in 2004, observations were made that suggested approximately 90% of the mass of BPM 37093 had crystallized.[69][72][73] Other work gives a crystallized mass fraction of between 32% and 82%.[74] As a white dwarf core undergoes crystallization into a solid phase, latent heat is released which provides a source of thermal energy that delays its cooling.[75] Metal-Rich White Dwarfs[edit] Around 25-33% of white dwarfs have metal lines in their spectra, which is unusual because any heavy elements in a white dwarf should sink into the star's interior in just a small fraction of the star's lifetime.[86] The prevailing explanation for metal-rich white dwarfs is that they have recently accreted rocky planetesimals.[86] The bulk composition of the accreted object can be measured from the strengths of the metal lines. For example, a 2015 study of the white dwarf Ton 345 concluded that its metal abundances were consistent with those of a differentiated, rocky planet whose mantle had been eroded by the host star's wind during its asymptotic giant branch phase The first magnetic white dwarf to be observed was GJ 742, which was detected to have a magnetic field in 1970 by its emission of circularly polarized light.[91] It is thought to have a surface field of approximately 300 million gauss (30 kT).[78], §8 The magnetic fields in a white dwarf may allow for the existence of a new type of chemical bond, perpendicular paramagnetic bonding, in addition to ionic and covalent bonds, resulting in what has been initially described as "magnetized matter" in research published in 2012.[94] A white dwarf can also be cannibalized or evaporated by a companion star, causing the white dwarf to lose so much mass that it becomes a planetary mass object. The resultant object, orbiting the former companion, now host star, could be a helium planet or diamond planet.[120][121] http://phys.org/news/2016-12-pulsations-hot-helium-atmosphere-white-dwarf.html sURFACE ROTATION OF 10.7 HOURS WITH THE CLAIM THAT ALL ROTATE AT LOW DETECTION LEVELS.

December 30, 2016

&lt;sec&gt; &lt;heading&gt;&lt;/heading&gt; &lt;para&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/para&gt; &lt;/sec&gt;

<sec> <heading></heading> <para> </para> </sec> Here’s what I think happened. As S W Carey proposed, there was a significant planet where the asteroid belt is now. He called it Aztec. The question is what produced the high energy gas cloud we are now in per NASA. W Brown’s IN THE BEGINNING G Gilligan GODKINGSCENARIO E Malkowski […]

[googleapps domain="docs" dir="document/d/10y-wDTShfDU5NDDJVjHAUxcmou9-DWwc6IEjoIy8_ZQ/pub" query="embedded=true" /]

http://phys.org/news/2015-02-view-solar-astrophysical-jets-driven.html
The model indicates that the heliospheric tail doesn’t extend to large distances but is split into two by the two jets, and that the format of the jets is similar to that of astrophysical jets observed in many other stars and around black holes.

http://scitechdaily.com/new-research-reveals-two-solar-wind-jets-heliosphere/

“Everyone’s assumption has been that the shape of the heliosphere was molded by the flow of interstellar material passing around it,” said Merav Opher, an astronomer at Boston University, who is lead author on the paper. “Scientists thought the solar wind flowing down the tail could easily pull the magnetic fields in the heliosphere along as it flowed by, creating this long tail. But it turns out the magnetic fields are strong enough to resist that pull – so instead they squeeze the solar wind and create these two jets.”

More evidence to show that our sun , Sol, is losing magnetic energy, just like how a magnetar is proposed to die. That implication means that life is ephemeral in the universe, occurring at the end of a magnetar’s life span. But if sciemce is correct that ‘“dead” magnetars populate the universe, then life must have left signs of itself.
One might propose that life’s span is the range from when the jets collapse and retain the energy to when the jets are no longer energized from Sol.

An IBEX paper from 2013 also described as a two-lobed shape down the tail. Opher and Drake suggest that the lobes observed might actually have been the two jets with interstellar, non-heliospheric material in between. The paper on the IBEX results, however, interpreted the heliosphere as having a long tail.

One might soon expect to see a correction to the IBEX data that incorporates this polar jet model.

Where did Greenland come from?

Take a look at the GROCE map:

See that depression that is the entire Caribbean Sea? Beginning at the Leeward/Windward Islands?
We are told that Africa and South America fit exactly, well that is not quite the truth. The fit stops about the Caribbean and then there is a gap. This gap is where land was

http://www.slideshare.net/proyectomatriz/earth-expansion-tectonics-part-1-samuel-warren-carey

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NtnjZGtUSc
You see per modern interpretation Africa fits lower and leaves a large gap that was in fact land. And the entire land masses around the Arctic show evidence of an inward spiral.
Reconstructions of the continents around the North … – ResearchGate
http://www.researchgate.net/…North…/d912f508f1ae42638e.pdf‎
by TH Torsvika – 2001 – Cited by 171 – Related articles
We suggest a radically new fit for. Greenland in between Europe and North America in the Early Mesozoic. This fit keeps Greenland `locked’ to Europe …

You’ve visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 5/31/13

http://understandearth.com/Herndon%20Current%20Science%2051210.pdf

Herndon has an interest theory that Earth was compressed inside gases and when these blew off, the rebound created the expanded Earth.

This interesting paper shows Greenland in geologic time at 30 degrees North Latitude.

When the blow out occurred, Greenland was shoved north by the energy. This blocked the ocean circulation and made the climate we have today. Of course, it completely iced Greenland.

Science tells us the south Atlantic is in parts only 100 my old. Antarctica ice-age is only 33 million years and before that it was temperate–a paradise.

http://phys.org/news139060720.html
Reporting today (28 August) in the journal Nature, scientists at the University of Bristol and the University of Leeds show that only changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide are able to explain the transition from the mostly ice-free Greenland of three million years ago, to the ice-covered Greenland of today.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130711142405.htm
Science revises ice cover of Antarctica down to 12 million years ago.

33 million years ago is just yesterday in geologic terms. For us humans, anything older than 500 years is the same for any amount of zeros you want to add. The only way we can make sense out of it is to apply the same environment we know to what we don’t.

What caused the blow out? A heated core that released more gases?

GREENLAND ICE IS ONLY 3 MILLION YEARS OLD

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080827163818.htm
“Prior to that, Greenland was largely ice-free and probably covered in grass and forest. Furthermore, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were relatively high. So the question we wanted to answer was why did Greenland become covered in an ice-sheet?”

Not only why but how? The how would have required extremely high atmospheric content of water vapor just so it could fall as snow. Where did it come from?
The Messinian stage of the geologic record shows that almost 6 million years ago the Med dried and did not refill for half a million years There were no ice caps at that time. Greenland was bisected with sea ways.

Where was the water? In the air, in the rivers in the sky. The water veil was in full operation. If water in the atmosphere protected the Earth from solar radiation, then what produced the mutations that resulted in the pygmy elephants of Cyprus?

Earth gases: carbon dioxide, methane, particularly in areas where the sea floor was exposed: the Med.

Instead, the new research suggests that the dominant cause of the Greenland glaciation was the fall from high atmospheric carbon dioxide levels to levels closer to that of pre-industrial times. Today concentrations are approaching the levels that existed while Greenland was mostly ice-free.

Why levels fell no one knows, but I can guess.

They fell because they were abnormally high due to the long term lasting effects of a gas blow out. I believe the high levels will be shown to have a sudden onset. That sudden onset was due to a heated core of Earth unable to retain the produced gases inside and swiftly expelled them in a blast outward. The length of time the gases existed on the surface then would be how quickly the gases were managed by the natural storage lockers of carbon dioxide.

That is why you have the sudden appearance and sudden fall, it is a huge event of specific duration.

Our planet’s microbial life and biological systems have acted just like our 911 responders; they immediately swing into action, clean up the mess, and go dormancy when its over until next time.

8/12/2013
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130811150608.htm
Aug. 11, 2013 — The Greenland ice sheet is melting from below, caused by a high heat flow from the mantle into the lithosphere. This influence is very variable spatially and has its origin in an exceptionally thin lithosphere.

Why does Greenland have an exceptionally thin lithosphere? Because of its slide north.

Thinking about this and plate tectonics and wondering about the continental movement that placed Antarctica into the south pole area, I am inclined to believe that a spiral vortex was responsible, not the simplistic continental drift. It appears to me that these two spiral vortexes, one at the north pole and one at the south, acted to draw continental mass to the polar areas.

http://www.atlantismaps.com/chapter_2.html

Yet even if this were at all possible there are still the issues of the continent’s orientation and overscaling which demand an explanation. Finé’s Antarctic continent is rotated roughly 20 degrees counterclockwise from its actual alignment with South America, but much more troubling is the fact that Finé renders the continent 2-1/2 to 3 times its actual size. Hapgood attributes the error of overscaling to a copyist confusing the 80th parallel on the source map with the Antarctic Circle. It would seem that Hapgood spent little time investigating this particular theory. Had he done so he would have realized how flawed this idea actually was. If the copyist confused the 80th parallel with the Antarctic Circle—66.6° latitude—and the source map was inscribed with additional latitudinal delineations as Hapgood also suggests, this would mean that the source map had very little resemblance to Finé and Mercator’s rendering of the continent and in turn have very little resemblance to Antarctica.

What possible reason for overscaling could there be? Perhaps it is not overscaling at all; perhaps it is the actual known size. How then could a land mass be consumed?
We have sea floor spreading where the material being produced is offset by the material being consumed.

What possible mechanism could there be that would allow mass to fail to maintain itself at the poles? Is the spiraling vortex responsible for mass deterioration, perhaps even removal? Let us consider how a star off loads mass. The material rejected by the star is dirty gas, and it is held off far from the star at a distance on the accretion disk where it is jetted light years away as a quasar. Now consider our Earth, is a similar mechanism of jetting material from the poles through a spiral vortex possible? Wouldn’t the material first have to transmute to basic elements? And then be exited as hydrogen and oxygen, water?

As we have seen in our solar magnetic reversals, there is a delay in the actions of the solar hemispheres. Clearly this is the reason for the complete coverage of the magnetic pole with the land of Antarctica as opposed to what appears to be the delay of the land mass arriving at the north magnetic pole.

Let us conjecture the appearance of the Arctic if the mass of Greenland had indeed arrived; the mass of Greenland would sit over the polar area. The deep chasms and rifting in the sea floor in this area completely surrounding Greenland would seem to indicate massive disturbance of the lithosphere. Is Greenland actually the gathering of material from the spiraling vortex? Would the material of Antarctica also have been the foci of the southern spiral? Did both of these spirals originate much closer to the Equator? And move apart from each other?

What is the result of this imbalance between polar masses?

Is the fact that fission fails due to turbulence that sets in and disrupts the pressure applicable here? Even our famous graphene shortcoming is now understood to be an infinitesimal disruption in layering. Is this imbalance reflected in the macro world between land masses on the poles on Earth? How would this imbalance be shown in the macro solar system? Is the fact that the sun has an imbalance between hemispheres relevant?

Uranus is known to disturb the sun the least, and even sun diving comets provoke a full CME. So would our water provoked wishy-washy world be the cause of the sun imbalance?

If the periods between the one-two punch are indeed shortening, as the periods between the extinction events, then would that indicate that an initiating event occurred and has been reducing in long term effect and slowly diminishing to the original condition? Or to the new state without any referencing material to what was?

What caused the original disturbance? Proxima Centauri’s ejection from its place next to Sol?

Is the fact that the photons streaming in from the sun to the North Pole in any way changed due to the fact that hydrogen and water meet them instead of metalized earth?

2013 review news from NASA:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/29aug_megacanyon/
This astonishing rift that serves to create the 3 islands of Greenland is clear evidence of the Thunderbolts.com claim of plasma strikes on the face of the Earth creating chaining. Add this to the strangely thin lithosphere under Greenland.

Were the Grand Canyon and this unique feature of Greenland created at the same time?

Were the plasma bolts the cause that may have drawn the land in the North Hemisphere toward the north pole? Was there a blue spiral ejection of energy from the north pole? Was this where our antimatter disappeared to?

Was the icing of Greenland recent? Did the water veil lose coherence and collapse as ice?

http://phys.org/news/2014-06-refreezing-deep-greenland-ice-sea.html

Update 12/15/2014

http://phys.org/news/2014-12-global-similar-today-size-duration.html
The PETM has been reanalyzed and here the researchers say that the PETM consisted of two pulses of heat, carbon heat. The first was recovered from quickly–1500 years–but the second took 200,000. The best guess is methane release from deep sea floor in perhaps a slip or slide.

This was followed by many other similar but weaker cycles.

Greenland began its trek North.

What enormous pull drew this continent North. Was it a spiral of magnetic energy? The article specifies that there was no ice at the poles at this time, and I am wondering if there was ice afterward as there was land drawn into the Arctic circle where before there was none.

Could the pull have been so extreme that North America and Russia also were
drawn? I look at the Tibetan Plateau and see the same kind of drawing, only there was no ocean to close, only land to spiral up in a mass.

Then what would have been the source? To imagine an outside source is bypassing what is the first choice of prime mover, energy from the core of the Earth. This energy, spiraling outward, magnetic energy, leaving the Earth depleted in magnetism and overwhelmed by gravity.

This draining could be an alignment of our inner and outer planets in conjunction with the sun in its path in the galaxy. We do not have enough information to know if this is even possible. I suggest that line of inquiry is our best choice going forward.

Since the Second Law cannot be subverted, where is the magnetic energy? Our scientists watch the sun and its magnetic energy impacting the Earth’s magnetic field and see the energy from the sun change. Not change once but change several times.
It is possible that our magnetic energy leaving Earth did not go far. Is it in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is it possible that the water on Earth, the water that is more than meets the coastlines but drowns them, is the transmuted magnetic energy?

We in 2014 are experiencing the Uranus and Neptune alignment on the Earth. Scientists have projected a 25 year cold downturn in the Earth weather. If we project that this energy level has fallen significantly since the PETM, could it be that the level of energy we experience would be similar to circular holes in the Earth? Might these be the smoking gun of energy release?

http://iceagenow.info/2015/01/greenland-ice-melt-caused-heat-flow-deep-earth/
The recent discovery of two Sub-Glacial Freshwater Lakes beneath the Greenland Continental Ice Sheet is highly significant.
Although not interpreted as being related to geothermal heat by the authors, it is clear that geothermal heat is the most likely cause. The two lakes are located in the north central portion of Greenland beneath 1500 feet of ice and 30 miles from the ice-free edge. They each cover an area of five square miles, and most importantly, are oriented in the NNE linear trend, a fault-riddled area.
The evidence for geologically induced geothermal heat flow on the Greenland continent shows that recent reports from NASA on Greenland ice melt from global warming are premature and ill informed.

Also of significant relevance to the geologically induced geothermal heat flow of Greenland is a recently published research project by the GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences.
“… the oldest and thickest part of the Greenland Ice Sheet is strongly influenced by heat flow from the deep Earth. We find that the geothermal heat flux in central Greenland increases from west to east due to thinning of the lithosphere, which is only about 25–66% as thick as is typical for terrains of early Proterozoic age5. Complex interactions between geothermal heat flow and glaciation-induced thermal perturbations in the upper crust over glacial cycles lead to strong regional variations in basal ice conditions, with areas of rapid basal melting adjoining areas of extremely cold basal ice.”

Addition 1/2015

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-greenland-ice.html

No ice on Greenland for 500 my and then Boom! 2.7 my ago and ICE.

And the reasons are: The reason for that is the interaction of three tectonic processes. For one thing, Greenland had to be lifted up, such that the mountain peaks reached into sufficiently cold altitudes of the atmosphere. Secondly, Greenland needed to move sufficiently far northward, which led to reduced solar irradiation in winter. Thirdly, a shift of the Earth axis caused Greenland to move even further northward.

Greenland migrating, shift of the Earth’s axis
The seismological investigations also showed that the lithosphere in the East of Greenland is especially thin – only about 90 kilometers thick. Earth scientists Steinberger and colleagues reconstructed the position of the tectonic plates 60 to 30 million years ago, and found that the Iceland plume was exactly beneath this part of Greenland during that time. This explains why the lithosphere is so thin. For that reason, the eastern part of Greenland could also be more easily uplifted: Plume material can flow up to a depth of less than 100 km and therefore lift up the overlying lithosphere comparatively easily.
Whereas the Iceland plume remained in approximately the same position in the Earth mantle, Greenland moved as a tectonic plate, with a northward component of six degrees of latitude during the past 60 Million years, towards cooler regions.
This northward motion was amplified through “True polar wander”: “Our computations show that the Earth axis shifted about 12° towards Greenland during the last 60 million years” GFZ researcher Steinberger says. Therefore, in combination with the tectonic plate motion, Greenland moved about 18° northward. It was now sufficiently far north, and its mountain tops in the East were sufficiently high, such that glaciations could be initiated.

Well,it says Greenland MOVED over the hot spot Iceland now occupies. But it didnt take 60 my, it ran. Or rather was pulled.

VINDICATION IS SWEET.

Here the authors note that 5 my ago is actually when the uplift occurred when Greenland was largely free of ice: These glaciations began in the East of Greenland. The authors found hints in rock samples that the high mountains in the east of Greenland were only uplifted during the last ten million years, whereby this process happened especially fast since about 5 million years ago. At that time, Greenland was still largely free of ice.

Well, we know that the Med began to fill then also.

I hope we are narrowing down the window for our latest global cataclysm.

http://www.science20.com/news_articles/true_polar_wander_why_greenland_ice_took_so_long_to_develop-151977
Whereas the Iceland plume remained in approximately the same position in the Earth mantle, Greenland moved as a tectonic plate, with a northward component of six degrees of latitude during the past 60 Million years, towards cooler regions.
This northward motion was amplified through “True polar wander”: “Our computations show that the Earth axis shifted about 12° towards Greenland during the last 60 million years” GFZ researcher Steinberger says. Therefore, in combination with the tectonic plate motion, Greenland moved about 18° northward. It was now sufficiently far north, and its mountain tops in the East were sufficiently high, such that glaciations could be initiated.
Steinberger, B., Spakman, W., Japsen, P., Torsvik, T.H., ‘The key role of global solid-Earth processes in preconditioning Greenland’s glaciation since the Pliocene’, Terra Nova, 04-01-2015, DOI: 10.1111/ter.12133

well, here is a combination of plate tectonics (6 degrees of latitude) and 12 degrees of axis shift.

I suspect that our thin lithosphere, alone among all the planets, is going to be the bedrock condition upon which TPW and plate tectonics, and the various other amendments attributed to our speciality rely.

http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2015/04/14/fragment-of-continental-crust-found-under-south-east-iceland/
Crustal thickness mapping shows thick crust under south east Iceland of up to 30 km, which is more ‘typical’ of continental crust in comparison to much thinner crust in the surrounding ocean basins and under the rest of Iceland.
The thick crust of south east Iceland extends eastwards offshore and is interpreted as being a sliver of continental crust originally part of, but now separated from, the Jan Mayan micro-continent to the north from which it has rifted during the formation of the north east Atlantic in the last 55 million years.
Professor Kusznir added: “Global crustal thickness mapping, using gravity inversion, suggests that tectonic features, such as Iceland, formed by the interaction of mantle plumes, sea-floor spreading and micro-continent fragments, are quite common.

I recall that Alaska also has some oceanic crust in its mix.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_14/2.html
Detailed experiments showed that the magnetic field produced by an electric current is always oriented perpendicular to the direction of flow. A simple method of showing this relationship is called the left-hand rule. Simply stated, the left-hand rule says that the magnetic flux lines produced by a current-carrying wire will be oriented the same direction as the curled fingers of a person’s left hand (in the “hitchhiking” position), with the thumb pointing in the direction of electron flow:

https://www.technology.org/2015/05/14/left-handed-cosmic-magnetic-field-could-explain-missing-antimatter/
he discovery of a ‘left-handed’ magnetic field that pervades the universe could help explain a long standing mystery – the absence of cosmic antimatter. A group of scientists, led by Prof Tanmay Vachaspati from Arizona State University in the United States, with collaborators at the University of Washington and Nagoya University, announce their result in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

http://www.sott.net/article/297007-Breaking-wave-cloud-formations-disturb-Earths-magnetic-field-surprisingly-often-say-scientists

“Our paper shows that the waves, which are created by what’s known as the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, happens much more frequently than previously thought,” co-author Joachim Raeder of the University of New Hampshire (UNH) Space Science Center within the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, said in a statement. “And this is significant because whenever the edge of Earth’s magnetosphere, the magnetopause, gets rattled it will create waves that propagate everywhere in the magnetosphere, which in turn can energize or de-energize the particles in the radiation belts.”

Kelvin-Helmholtz instability waves – named for 19th century scientists Lord William Thomson Kelvin and Hermann von Helmholtz – can be seen in everyday life, such as in cloud patterns, on the surface of oceans or lakes, or even in a backyard pool. The distinctive waves with capped tops and cloudless troughs are created by what’s known as velocity shear, which occurs when a fluid or two different fluids – wind and water, for example – interact at different speeds to create differing pressures at the back and front ends of the wave.

This is bizarre in that it alters the energy level of the Van Allen Belts.

Please, please, please don’t let them call it gravity waves. Or Planetary gravity waves.

.Pluto due to host a satellite visitor from Earth.

This gut feeling? After the drama from Ceres due to the lowering of the satellite now, June 30, and the visitation to Pluto, for which the US is taking bows center stage,
FINALLY, AT LONG LAST science will announce that Sol is the product of a ……………………………………………………………………..planetary nebula.!

Inside your Discover Magazine this July 2015 are several salient points in support of this.

Science announces that carbon dioxide makes you dumb. ie all gases do, especially radon.

In the article on Pluto, please note a reference to the thinking re Jupiter. Of late thought to have been circling into Sol, but now seen as reversing this movement and whooshing back out dragging all sorts of solar system goodies with it.

Well, obviously the scientists–not me–are getting ready to revise Sol’s history to include a ……………………………planetary nova!!!

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Saturn-s-Outer-Ring-Is-7-000-Times-Bigger-Than-the-Planet-Itself-484120.shtml
This makes me wonder how much of the missing material that supposedly disproves the exploded planet scenario as the source of the asteroid belt has been found?

I speculate that if you include this dust, the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, the asteroid belt material in your calculations of the missing material to make a planet–S W Carey called it Aztec—-I suspect you may have the mass of an impactor just the right size to produce the Giant Red Spot on Jupiter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_nebula
Or maybe a planetary nova.

http://www.livingcosmos.com/earth.htm

Here the author has long described the planetary nebula and how its condensation produced the Field Dynamical Earth Model that produces the spiraling energy.

Being a system of fields, this new model is labeled the Field-dynamical Earth Model, abbreviated FEM. FEM brings to mind the Earth Mother that has permeated various cultures the world over throughout time. FEM has twelve fields, or considering the fact that they lie on exact opposite sides of the Earth, they might be considered six fields. That is, if one were to pass a rod into one field and through the other on the opposite side of the Earth, it would pass through the exact center of the Earth. This is likely the reason that it is now considered very possible that the core has hexagonal symmetry (a sex-sided spherical polygon) A myriad of phenomena are noted in these field areas, and much of the remainder of the book uncovers the vast array of phenomena that relates to these areas, though the subject matter is quite different and unique in each tome and chapter.

The Vital Vastness reviews these observations after discussing the evidence and providing maps of the various associated phenomena:
The Fields (time-varying particle accelerators), which are situated just above the bulge along the equator at about the 30o to 40o latitudes in both hemispheres and also the poles, are associated with other phenomena. Each forms a sinusoidal or S-shaped relationship to another Field. Each is on the exact opposite end of the Earth from another, so that if a rod were put in one and through the center of the Earth, it would come out in the middle of another Field. Terrestrial electricity spirals, strange sounds, and magnetic and gravity anomalies occur in each. The deepest parts of the ocean floor, ocean current patterns, strong storms deep on the ocean floor, some of the highest values of ocean surface salinity, and the most plentiful locations for bursting bubbles, producing stronger atmospheric charge are other associations. These same areas are high and low pressure systems in weather and storm centers. Spiraling gaseous nebulae have been observed from space centering in each Field. The Earth’s surface layer (lithosphere) and the physical aspects of plate tectonics (subduction zones, plate boundaries, rises, rifts, stress patterns, earthquake-wave anomalies, etc.) are related to the Fields’ locations. Lighted displays (ionized particles) and dark masses (neutrons) have been observed repeatedly. Patterns and changes in the upper atmosphere, radiation belts, and the magnetosphere show relationships to the Fields. Eels, iron-precipitating bacteria, and electric fishes are geographically located in these areas. More than 70 percent of all life on Earth is situated in relation to the Fields (between the 40o latitudes), which is ideal for the generation of electrical energy by life.

https://www.technology.org/2013/05/23/researchers-explain-magnetic-field-misbehavior-in-solar-flares-the-culprit-is-turbulence/
What causes magnetic breaking and reconnection?
Turbulence.
What causes turbulence–the heat of the corona–?

http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/06/why-is-the-suns-corona-so-hot-two-words-solar-tornadoes/
To crack the problem of the super-hot corona, the researchers focused their attention on the chromosphere. Using data from SDO and SST, they measured the motion of various elements in the Sun’s atmosphere (iron, calcium, and helium) via the Doppler effect. These different gases all exhibited vortex behavior, aligned with the same spot on the photosphere. The authors identified 14 vortices during a single 55-minute observing run, which lasted for an average of about 13 minutes. Based on these statistics, they determined the Sun should have at least 11,000 vortices on its surface at any given time, at least during periods of low sunspot activity.
Due to the different wavelengths of light the observers used, they were able to map the shape and speed of the vortices as a function of height in the chromosphere. They found the familiar tornado shape: tapered at the base, widening at the top, reaching diameters of 1500 km. Each vortex was aligned along a single axis over a bright spot in the photosphere, which is the sign of a concentration of magnetic field lines.
With that hint, they ran a series of computer simulations including both gas and magnetic effects. They found the processes in the photosphere funneled the magnetic field lines into knots of high concentration, which rotate as the gas itself circulates. (This is known as the “bathtub effect,” since it rotates in a similar way to the vortex produced in a draining tub of water). The intensity of the magnetic field in turn forces the gas in the chromosphere to follow a spiral trajectory up and away from the Sun’s surface, speeding it up during the process. Temperature is related to the average speed in a gas, so higher speeds mean higher temperatures—sufficient to explain the million-degree coronal temperatures.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/mangrove-forest-magnetism-may-heat-suns-corona-180955556/?no-ist

http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2014/10/08/the-origin-and-mechanism-of-the-sun-s-magnetic-field-still-an-unsolved-mystery-using-the-current-model/
There is no way that the current magnetic field of the Sun, which is the strongest magnetic field compared to any other body in the solar system, can be a remnant of an ancient magnetic field. If this is the case then the primordial surface field must have diffused back out into space in just a few million years. In other words, the vestigial magnetic field should have been carried off by the solar wind and by the ejected plasma (Coronal Mass Ejections).
Astronomers and astrophysicists who study newly formed stars observe very high activity from these young stellar objects. They produce intense flares and other powerful magnetic explosions during their chromospherically-active formative years. Thus, if our star went through the same process, then its ancient magnetic field must have diffused into space in a matter of a few million years after its formation.
Theoretical physicists not only believe that the magnetic field of the Sun is a remnant of the ancient field acquired by it during its formation, but they also believe this primordial field is still trapped within the so-called “Radiative Zone”, located 100,000 km below the Sun’s surface. They also think that the strength of this field is over one million Gauss. But this theoretical belief is not supported by any modern space observation. Data from satellites like SOHO use Helioseismometers clearly show that the internal magnetic field cannot be stronger than 30 Gauss.

It isn’t an old field. The Beetle Sun imploded to produce Sol, a magnetar, and the discarded ‘dirty gas’ to produce the rocky planets within the Beetle Sun’s former space.

A ‘cloaked magnetar’ does not display its Gauss level at the surface. So it may be possible that Sol is a ‘cloaked magnetar’ far surpassing 1 million Gauss.

I suspect ‘leakage’ is what is heating the corona..

If Sol is a ‘cloaked’ magnetar, then our system must be responsible. It is the H2O?

Extreme pressure inside the Oort shell?

The presence of Jupiter and Saturn minimizing the magnetic shell produced by the Beetle Sun?

If we only see 50 magnetars, then how rapidly do they die?

http://www.sott.net/article/299163-Neutrons-find-the-missing-magnetism-of-plutonium
Explanation as to why platinum holds 200x hydrogen is probably due to a similar ‘flux’ of the neutrons.

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Hinode_IRIS_and_ATERUI_cooperate_on_70_year_old_solar_mystery_999.html

Latest theory: “Alfvenic” waves. These magnetically driven waves can carry significant amounts of energy along the magnetic field lines, enough energy in fact to heat and maintain the corona. But for this theory to work, there needs to be a mechanism through which this energy can be converted into heat.
A prominence is a filamentary bundle of cool, dense gas floating in the corona. Here, ‘cool’ is a relative term; a prominence is typically about 10,000 degrees. Although denser than the rest of the corona, a prominence doesn’t sink because magnetic field lines act like a net to hold it aloft. The individual filaments composing the prominence, called threads, follow the magnetic field lines. But in the case of the prominence threads, the torsional motion is half-a-beat out of sync with the transverse motion driving it: there is a delay between the maximum speed of the transverse motions and the maximum speed of the torsional motion

In this model, transverse waves resonate with torsional waves, strengthening the torsional waves; similar to how a child on a swing can add energy to the swing, causing it to swing higher and faster, by moving his body in time with the motion.

Models: The simulations show that this resonance occurs within a specific layer of the prominence thread close to its surface (see Figure 3). When this happens, a half-circular torsional flow around the boundary is generated and amplified. This is known as the resonant flow. Because of its location close to the boundary, the maximum speed of this flow is delayed by half-a-beat from the maximum speed of the transverse motion, just like the pattern actually observed (see Figure 2).
The simulations further reveal that this resonant flow along the surface of a thread can become turbulent. The appearance of turbulence is of great importance since it is effective at converting wave energy into heat energy. Another important effect of this turbulence is to enlarge the resonant flow predicted in the models to the size actually observed.

This model can explain the main features of the observations as the results of a two-step process. First resonant absorption transfers energy to the torsional motions, producing a resonant flow along the surface of the prominence thread. Then turbulence in this strengthened resonant flow converts the energy into heat (see Figure 2).

Do you think this resonance flow is the source of magnetars? With the torsional motion being NOT out of sync? Or being even greater ?

I wonder …
By: katesisco
if these hot plumes will eventually be seen as a result of the southern hemisphere of the Earth suffering a ‘glitch’ in its eastward rotation? But then it doesnt quite make sense that way. It seems that the huge mantle heating under the southern hemisphere may be the result of the northern hemisphere slowing while the southern continued?
It appears that 5 million years ago—when we appeared—the Isthmus of Panama was rotated into the space between N & S America, the Med experienced a flood of water that refilled the basin leading to much later an overflow into the Black Sea ending early civilizations there.
So let’s see: a magnetic ‘grip’ caught hold of the Northern hemisphere of Earth, delaying its rotation while the southern hemisphere continued bringing a land bridge into connection between the n and s hemispheres, altering sea currents, creating tsunamis everywhere possibly bringing cetaceans to rest atop the Appalachians, with resultant magma build up in the mantle/core boundary.
It is fascinating to see the dichotomy the sea floor rift between Africa and SA makes with a disjunction of a strong rift to the right in the southern hemisphere. As if it had continued to progress eastward while being held back the closer one approaches the Equator to the north.
Eagerly awaiting more info on our early geologic history. S W Carey’s idea of inflation is not too far wrong.
Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:44 UTC

If this is not the result of an outside effect then what is creating the build up of energy that is then released thru the N pole area? This would seem to have the effect of a spiral magnetic grip, the spiral being anticlockwise. That would manifest as a brake on the normal eastward rotation of planet Earth. That this event has occurred is obvious in the ‘drawing’ of Greenland North.
Greenland did not ice until 3 million years ago.

http://news.discovery.com/earth/global-warming/prehistoric-greenland-ice-melt-led-to-20-foot-sea-rise-140626.htm

A CONNECTION BETWEEN N&S EARTH HEMISPHERES

WHY THE DELAY IN THE SUN’S MAGNETIC REVERSAL

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2013/04/29/silicone.liquid.crystal.stiffens.with.repeated.compression

“The molecules in a liquid crystal elastomer are like rods that want to point in a particular direction,” Verduzco said. “In the starting sample, the rods are randomly oriented, but when the material is deformed, they rotate and eventually end up pointing in the same direction. This is what gives rise to the stiffening. It’s surprising that by a relatively gentle but repetitive compression, you can work out all the entanglements and knots to end up with a sample where all the polymer rods are aligned.”

NASA’s Aquarius sees salty shifts
Published: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 – 18:02 in Astronomy & Space
One of the features that stand out most clearly is a large patch of highly saline water across the North Atlantic. This area, the saltiest anywhere in the open ocean, is analogous to deserts on land, where little rainfall and a lot of evaporation occur. A NASA-funded expedition, the Salinity Processes in the Upper Ocean Regional Study (SPURS), traveled to the North Atlantic’s saltiest spot last fall to analyze the causes behind this high salt concentration and to validate Aquarius measurements.

Related images
(click to enlarge)

An anomaly of salt in the N Atlantic? An anomaly in the S Atlantic?

http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/q525.html
The Van Allen belt dips down and brings radiation very close to Earth at the SSA.

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130312/C4ISR01/303120028/The-Bermuda-Triangle-Space-High-Energy-South-Atlantic-Anomaly-Threatens-Satellites

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/03/21/record-blocking-patterns-fueling-extreme-washington-d-c-march-weather/
Many graphs, info as to record heat, cold due to NA block. Is this connected to the SAA?

http://www.wunderground.com/resources/climate/abruptclimate.asp

As seen in Figure 1, the ice core record showed frequent sudden warmings and coolings of 15°F (8°C) or more. Many of these changes happened in less than 10 years. In one case 11,600 years ago, when Earth emerged from the final phase of the most recent ice age (an event called the Younger Dryas), the Greenland ice core data showed that a 15°F (8°C) warming occurred in less than a decade, accompanied by a doubling of snow accumulation in 3 years. Most of this doubling occurred in a single year.
http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition/down_to_earth/with_a_grain_of_salt

“One interesting hypothesis is that changes in [the current’s] strength could impact where the Gulf Stream separates from continent and starts flowing offshore,” says Toole. In the last 15 years, the surface Arctic Ocean is a lot fresher than it has been in the past. For the last 20 years, subtropical regions of the North Atlantic have become saltier. However, the extreme regions of highest and lowest salinity have a direct relationship to precipitation and evaporation. Therefore, it takes a long time for surface effects to change deep ocean circulation patterns.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/10/1200602/-The-Antarctic-Half-of-the-Global-Thermohaline-Circulation-Is-Faltering#

Several recent reports, however, paint a more complex and disturbing picture where the intensifying winds are speeding up below surface currents bringing more above freezing water in contact with deep ice around Antarctica. Twenty of the ice shelves and many of the glaciers that feed them are melting from below.

WHY THERE IS A DELAY IN THE SUN’S MAGNETIC REVERSAL

Is the fact that our local system is unbalanced in matter/antimatter related to the fact that our solar bodies show distinct ‘frame dragging’ between hemispheres starting with Sol?

Seabed mining has been identified as a source of new wealth and just where are the sources of mining? On the equator of the earth, of course. Why there? Because like the dark equatorial line on Encedalus, the equator of the Earth shows evidence of a twist of the global body in rich upwellings of metals.

In Rare Earth by P Ward and D Brownlee data is presented that show the continents are enlarging; and that during the 2.5 by ago the continents underwent riving and shuffling.

Are we seeing the creation of matter? How can we tell if cosmic dust is adding to continental mass? How can we measure magnetism between the two hemispheres of Earth?

New gravity disturbance maps show where ancient civilizations and gravity anomalies co exist:
http://geodesy.curtin.edu.au/research/models/GGMplus/gallery.cfm
These sites were hot beds of beginning successful civilizations, the Inca, the Basque, the Alpian thru Austria, the islands of the Med, North India, The Yuccatan, The Leeward Islands, The Atlas mountains of Africa and northwest coast islands.

I would propose that the unusual lava depositions in Turkey and Anatolia where the forms have been hollowed out for living are proof that gravity was in much reduced form when these tufa towers were laid down.
http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/troglodyte-village